You know those videos shared on Facebook that are titled “Are
you killing your children?” and the post is captioned with “MUST READ!” and you
find out the video is about how new studies suggest eating Fruit Loops could increase
your chances of having cancer? This is
basically my genre, with maybe a little less hysteria.
Appelo, Jurgen. "YouTube icon" 08/2012 via Flickr. Attribution 2.0 Generic. |
Here are some examples:
Social Context
The short videos that are shared on Facebook can come from a
wide range of websites. YouTube is
popular, but often these videos are shared from news sites and Facebook
groups. My platform will be the
Huffington Post. The subject can have a
wide range of content and subject, but most focus on explaining current events
or new studies.
News casters and news companies use these videos often to
explain a situation or report on the new studies and opinions that affect
people’s daily lives. The videos on the
Huffington Post are found within or at the end of an article. It serves to further the information
presented in the article and provide visuals.
It may also provide information on a slightly different idea that is
related to the topic of the article.
Rhetorical Patterns
of the Genre
The information is not meant to repeat what has just been
said, but give a further extension of the information. It includes both facts and opinions, but excludes
strong biases. The videos sometimes
include experts or simply new casters reporting the ideas and research of
others.
Since the videos are found on the tech page of the
Huffington Post, many of them rely heavily on logos and the presentation of
facts. However, many of the videos are
added to articles to bring the news to a personal level or apply it to everyday
life. This often leads to a use of
pathos. Through bringing on experts to
talk, they are also sometimes using ethos.
The videos often open with an introduction that puts the
video on a personal level. They quickly
describe the current situation and then go into explaining the opinions or
applications of the facts. The speakers
are clear and concise. They use short to
medium sentences to keep the knowledge easy to comprehend since the listener
cannot go back and “reread” a sentence.
The speakers might also start and/or end with a question.
The videos are meant to reach a large group of people so
they do not use specific jargon or slang.
The tone is always friendly and inviting. When the audience can see the speaker, the
speaker cannot usually get away with be harsh or aggressive as they can in
writing. The word choice is simple but
specific, as they have only so much time to state their idea.
Analysis
The genre tries to include the general public but does not
reach out to experts, scientists, etc.
The genre encourages writers to take on the “friendly neighbor with good
advice” role. This encourages the
audience not to feel inferior but intrigued.
When speakers use videos and social media, the audience can
connect better. A speaker that publishes
in a scientific journal may seem very distant compared to a speaker that posts
to Facebook. These videos value visual
aids and clips of daily life. They value
ideas that get to point quickly and are simple enough for the general public to
understand.
Reflection:
Austin's post discussed his genre of an opinionated news article. It was extremely different from my genre as it is very structured in the visual look of it. It showed me that I really need to take advantage of the visual appeal of my video. Stef's genre is very similar to mine. After reading her post, I realized some of the traps I could fall into in my own genre. I will have to be careful not to just list off a bunch of facts and opinions, I need to be building an argument and supporting reasons and rhetoric. Although this is basic, it will be easy to end up with no real argument.
Reflection:
Austin's post discussed his genre of an opinionated news article. It was extremely different from my genre as it is very structured in the visual look of it. It showed me that I really need to take advantage of the visual appeal of my video. Stef's genre is very similar to mine. After reading her post, I realized some of the traps I could fall into in my own genre. I will have to be careful not to just list off a bunch of facts and opinions, I need to be building an argument and supporting reasons and rhetoric. Although this is basic, it will be easy to end up with no real argument.
Oh my gosh I looked at all of your examples and they are all so funny. The title in specific really caught my attention. I decided to look over your ideas about genre because I know we have a similar topic and a somewhat similar genre. That being said I really like how in depth you have gone to ensure you effectively use your genre. I think it's really interesting that your videos are inviting which I think is very effective for the audience and also that it doesn't speak to experts and scientists specifically. This is where our genres differentiate and I think it's interesting the different direction we each are taking!
ReplyDelete