A picture could be worth a thousand words if it was used correctly. Thus, I need to make sure that all my visual elements are cohesive and effective.
Is the feeling or tone that the image invokes appropriate to
the visual-rhetorical tone of my argument?
Woodpuncher. "Video" 2014 via Pixabay. Public Domain License. |
The images that I use to portray human genetic modification
could easily have a strong emotional impact, especially one that puts human genetic modification in a
bad light. I am trying to show that the
technology is in responsible hands and not something to fear. The images will need to be comforting but not
cheesy.
If the image is a graph or a chart, does it clearly support
a major point of my argument, or is it superfluous?
I want to use graphics and visual representations of the
research data so that people can feel like they have a grasp on the knowledge and
not feel threatened by the overwhelming science behind it all. To accomplish this, I will need to provide
only the important information and nothing to will be too complicated to
understand. This will only hinder my
point.
If the text is multimodal, is the image anchored or placed
within the verbal text effectively? Is
the verbal text in close proximity to the image that illustrates it?
For my video, I will need to decide where I can place the
image in relation to the audio. If I
place the image after what I make the point, the listener will be prepared for
what they are about to see. If I show
the image while I am talking, the viewer will be better able to follow
along. Sometimes, watch the narrator
speak can be a lot more effective than just listening to audio, so I will need
a good balance of me and images.
If you are writing a multimodal argument, do the visual
images help you move from point to point in the argument clearly?
I may want to consider some graphics that organize the video
into my different points. This might
include text on the video that highlights my “topic sentence” or numbers my
points. Both of these would indicate to
the reader that I was transitioning to the next point and would help me stay
structured instead of rambling.
Do the different visual and textual elements come together
persuasively as a whole, or are there elements that seem disconnected or out of
place?
I hope to use images sparingly, so that when they are used,
they are payed attention to. The images
are meant to enhance the audio, not distract from it.
Is the visual-rhetorical tone of your project consistent?
Human genetic modification is a serious topic, but I want my
argument to come across as comfortable and conversational. My images need to reflect this. Some images, such as the graphs, will be professional
and serious, while other pictures may lighten the mood. However, they will need to be cohesive.
It looks like visual elements will be extremely important to your project. For the most part I think you're on the right track with everything. Clearly you understand the relation of your topic to visuals, which is extremely important to crafting a sucessfull argument. You have very specific ideas of what to include, so moving forwards shouldn't be an issue as far as I can tell for you. Keep it up!
ReplyDelete